Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 09:20

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What's wrong with generation Z?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump's tariffs are hammering the industry he wants to save - Politico
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Dermot Mulroney, wife Prima Apollinaare to divorce after nearly 15 years of marriage - USA Today
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How much can you sell a 10k subscriber newsletter for?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Dying Light: The Beast launches August 22 - Gematsu
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.